|

Evaluating and Preparing a Plaintiff’s Commercial Litigation Case 2009
by EDWARD LOWRY
A. The Challenges and Opportunities of “The Great Recession” for Plaintiffs’ Attorneys
In many areas of plaintiffs’ commercial litigation, the recession has changed the focus and dynamics considerably
- Cases in general
- Leveling off of cases arising out of aggressive expansion
- Unfair competition
- Intellectual property
- More cases caused by hard times
- Protection of assets
- Breach of contract
- Bankruptcy (especially Chapter 11)
- Lien disputes
- Securities Arbitration.
- There are many more cases coming in the door, but not necessarily many more cases being filed
- Why did an account go septic?
- The difficulties of case evaluation when the whole market has “gone to hell in a handbasket.”
- Disputes among competitors
- Everybody wants somebody to blame when deals go bad - but few can afford an hourly fee
- Construction cases
- More cases involving contractors going under
- Mechanics liens
- Uncompleted projects
- More cases where contractors are milking their contracts
- Unnecessary additional work
- Misapplying construction draws
- More cases where owners are trying to squeeze contractors
- Becoming more technical about contract requirements
- Complaining more about results to cram down bills
- Employment law
- With a vastly larger number of layoffs there are many more people looking for ways to either block their dismissal, improve their severance packages or seek damages for contractual or statutory violations
- Employers are more tempted to walk into forbidden areas to save money
- E.g., laying off older, more expensive employees
- With a bad economy, it is harder to evaluate employer motivation
- Reading the tea leafs - Trying to interpret the signals coming from the other side
- Some of the messages are, or seem, different
- Especially those which are unrelated to case evaluation
- Money is tight
- Are the old assumptions still valid?
B. A Snapshot of the Preparation of Plaintiffs’ Commercial Litigation Cases
Initial case evaluation:
- Range of economic value drives decisions about the approach to be taken
- Contingent fee vs/ hourly fee
- If too small for contingent, does it make economic sense for the client to do it on an hourly basis?
- If hourly, can the client afford to bring the case?
- Considerations:
- Scope of discovery and other preparation
- The need for client assistance in order to economize
- Expert witnesses
- Experts to assist in discovery and fact analysis (e.g., electronic discovery, appraisers, economists and forensic CPAs, industry experts)
- Cost of Discovery
- Travel and other expenses
- Other fee options:
- Split hourly and contingency
- Reduced hourly rate with a results bonus
- Extended payment
- Advancing/paying costs for the client
- Strength of the case
- Almost all cases look good at first
- Parties to litigation have selective memories
- May not know how good a case really is until weeks or months into the case
- Initial investigation is critical
- Continual re-evaluation is critical
- Thorough research:
- Of all pertinent documents that can be obtained
- Of the dynamics of the subject industry
- Of the background of the potential defendant(s)
- Of the products/processes as well as the relevant industry or professional standards
- Of the relevant law
Early conversation with the defense is critical
- The interest of both sides in an early exchange of information (junk yard dogs stay chained up next to junk all their lives)
- Avoidance of weak cases
- Early understanding of potential risks and rewards
- Potential for effective, early mediation
- Potential savings of litigation costs - even if the case does not settle
- Potential for creative problem solving - the most overlooked area in commercial litigation
The Complaint
- Shotgun or arrow
- You have to eat what you put on your plate
- Economic considerations
- Decisional paralysis
Preliminary motions
- The defendant’s playground #1
- Stealing the march
- Testing the plaintiff’s resolve to go on with litigation
- Narrowing the issues
- Taking the temperature of the Court
Discovery -
- On both sides, be careful what you wish for - you might just get it
- Know why you are asking for what you are asking
- The defendant’s playground #2
- Testing the plaintiff’s resolve to go on with litigation
- Button, button, who’s got the button?
- The temptation for the plaintiff to get bogged down in too much information looking for the Holy Grail
- The plaintiff’s use of sluggish and evasive defense responses to affect the attitude of the Court
Mediation
- Advantages
- Potentially makes litigation more affordable for both parties
- 85-90% success rate
- Takes the decision out of the hands of strangers
- Creates certainty
- Offers the opportunity for solutions a court cannot offer
- Offers confidentiality of the entire process and the result
- Techniques
- Preparation of the client
- Case evaluation
- Managing expectations
- Don’t rush to the bottom line
- Preparation of the mediator
- Don’t give up the opportunity to affect the mediator’s view of the case
- The mediator is not a decision maker but he/she is a powerful influence on the decisions that must be made
- Don’t overwhelm the mediator with garbage
- Copies of relevant pleadings and briefs
- Pre-mediation statement
- Confidential or not?
- Do not give up the right to make an opening statement
- Opportunity to let the other side hear what your case will sound like to a court or jury
- Opportunity to hear what the other side’s case will sound like
- It’s all about risk/opportunity assessment
- Be visual - a picture really is worth a thousand words
- Power Point
- Graphics
- Handouts
- Let the parties speak
- The dance
- Be prepared to be insulted by the other side’s first offer
- Why we never seem to be able to cut to the chase quickly
- Send the clearest signals possible
- Patience
- Never, never, never walk away from the negotiating table
- Even if you think you have reached the end of your willingness to bend
- Even if everyone leaves without a settlement, let the other side know the door is still open
- Like the lottery, “you can’t win if you don’t play”
- Follow up later
- At the very least you will have had a rehearsal and will have learned useful information about the other side’s case
- Finally, a pitch for collegiality and professionalism
Back to Articles Page
Charlottesville Office
434.951.7200 / Toll-Free: 1.800.451.1288
Fax: 434.951.7218 |
|