Email Us Home

Template 1
  • Commercial
    • Introduction
    • Practice Areas
    • Our Team
    • Case Results
    • FAQs
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
  • Personal Injury
    • Introduction
    • Practice Areas
    • Our Team
    • Case Results
    • FAQs
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
  • Personal Services
    • Introduction
    • Practice Areas
    • Our Team
    • Appellate Opinions
    • FAQs
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
  • Law Firm Blogs
    • Child Safety Blog
    • Personal Services - Family Law Blog
    • Personal Injury Blog
    • Safety Blog
  • Attorneys
    • Elizabeth P. Coughter
    • James P. Cox, III
    • Gary W. Kendall
    • John V. Little
    • Edward B. Lowry
    • Kevin W. Ryan
    • William C. Scott IV
    • M. Bryan Slaughter
    • David W. Thomas
    • Christine Thomson
    • Ronald R. Tweel
    • J. Gregory Webb
    • Edward R. Slaughter
    • Kyle McNew
    • Jason P. Seiden
    • Former Principles
  • Firm Profile
    • About Us
    • History
    • Charlottesville Office
    • Roanoke Office
    • Office Administration

New Virginia Legislation Expands Consumer Protection Act Coverage of Foreclosure Avoidance Programs

user-pic By MichieHamlett Commercial Attorney on January 21, 2009 12:37 PM | No Comments | No TrackBacks
To its great credit the Virginia General Assembly this 2009 session passed HB 2261, a bill  designed to expand the Consumer Protection Act's coverage of mortgage foreclosure prevention scams.  Unscrupulous foreclosure avoidance companies often require desperate consumers to pay in advance for their services and then do little or nothing to really help.  When the General Assembly first recognized this and other dangers in foreclosure prevention programs, which are often nothing more than schemes to milk consumers' last dollars before they take their homes, it treated them as illegal only if a fee was taken prior to a settlement on a sale of a consumer's residential real property.  The new provisions make  advance fees illegal even if there is no sale of the real estate.


Consumers should also be pleased that when the General Assembly passed the original legislation that brought prepaid foreclosure prevention schemes into the Consumer Protection Act, it prohibited mandatory arbitration clauses.  The legislature's recognition that all arbitration clauses are not good should give consumers hope that lawmakers will expand prohibitions or limitations of such clauses into other areas of consumer protection law.

Categories:

  • Commercial

Tags:

  • Arbitration Clauses,
  • Foreclosure Prevention,
  • Legislation

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.mhlrt.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/39

Leave a comment

Template 1

Search

Sign In

Authors

  • MichieHamlett Personal Injury Attorney (34)
  • MichieHamlett Commercial Attorney (21)
  • Greg Webb (1)
  • MichieHamlett Personal Services Attorney (3)
  • Kevin (16)
  • Pearson (1)

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by MichieHamlett Commercial Attorney published on January 21, 2009 12:37 PM.

New Virginia Legislation Expands Consumer Protection Act Coverage of Foreclosure Avoidance Programs was the previous entry in this blog.

Virginia's Consumer Real Estate Settlement Protections Act, Provisions Strengthened is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

  • May 2011 (1)
  • April 2011 (1)
  • February 2011 (1)
  • January 2011 (3)
  • December 2010 (2)
  • November 2010 (1)
  • July 2010 (1)
  • April 2010 (2)
  • March 2010 (2)
  • January 2010 (3)
  • December 2009 (3)
  • October 2009 (4)
  • September 2009 (2)
  • August 2009 (8)
  • July 2009 (6)
  • June 2009 (5)
  • May 2009 (6)
  • April 2009 (5)
  • March 2009 (10)
  • February 2009 (6)
  • January 2009 (4)
  • Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed