Email Us Home

Template 1
  • Commercial
    • Introduction
    • Practice Areas
    • Our Team
    • Case Results
    • FAQs
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
  • Personal Injury
    • Introduction
    • Practice Areas
    • Our Team
    • Case Results
    • FAQs
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
  • Personal Services
    • Introduction
    • Practice Areas
    • Our Team
    • Appellate Opinions
    • FAQs
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
  • Law Firm Blogs
    • Commercial Blog
    • Personal Injury Blog
    • Personal Services Blog
    • Securities Litigation Blog
  • Attorneys
    • Katharine A.R. Brookeman
    • Elizabeth P. Coughter
    • James P. Cox, III
    • Gary W. Kendall
    • John V. Little
    • Edward B. Lowry
    • Kevin W. Ryan
    • William C. Scott IV
    • M. Bryan Slaughter
    • Garrett M. Smith
    • David W. Thomas
    • Christine Thomson
    • Paul R. Thomson III
    • Ronald R. Tweel
    • J. Gregory Webb
    • Edward R. Slaughter
    • Former Principles
  • Firm Profile
    • About Us
    • History
    • Charlottesville Office
    • Roanoke Office
    • Office Administration

New Virginia Supreme Court Decision Could Mean More Insurance Coverage Available for You!

user-pic By Paul, Roanoke, Virginia Attorney on July 6, 2009 10:15 AM | No Comments | No TrackBacks

On June 4, 2009, the Virginia Supreme Court issued a decision that is sure to have tremendous impact on injury victims and their insurers in the state of Virginia. The decision means that injured victims could potentially have a greater amount of uninsured motorist coverage available if the injured victim/insured owns more than one car on any auto policy that covers that victim/insured.


The case of Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. Williams, re-opens Virginia law to intra-policy stacking of uninsured motorist coverage. An example of intra policy stacking would be having 2 vehicles on one insurance policy, each with $100,000 in uninsured motorist coverage. Prior to this decision, you likely only had $100,000 in coverage. You now may have $200,000 in coverage, if your policy language meets the criteria in Williams. Virginia law has long allowed auto policy insurers to prohibit intra-policy stacking as long as their policies clearly and unambiguously stated that the stacking was not allowed. In Williams, the Court looked past the language stated in the policy itself and examined the language in the declarations page of the policy. That language differed from an earlier Virginia Supreme Court case. In short, the court found it to be ambiguous and allowed an additional $550,000 in coverage!!


I am sure that the insurance companies will be rushing to correct the language in their policies and declarations pages, to avoid this coverage issue. If you have been involved in a serious or catastrophic injury, and thought or have been told that there may not be enough insurance coverage, you should immediately request a certified copy of your insurance policy and declarations page so that an attorney can examine that for you and assist you in obtaining additional coverage, if necessary.

Categories:

  • Personal Injury

Tags:

  • Automobile Accidents,
  • Trucking accidents

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.mhlrt.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/30

Leave a comment

Template 1

Search

Sign In

Authors

  • Garrett (21)
  • Katharine (3)
  • Kevin (4)
  • Paul, Roanoke, Virginia Attorney (35)

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Paul, Roanoke, Virginia Attorney published on July 6, 2009 10:15 AM.

Kettle or Canister Style Pool Filters Can Be Deadly was the previous entry in this blog.

Is Your Child Swimming In a Safe Pool? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

  • January 2010 (3)
  • December 2009 (3)
  • October 2009 (4)
  • September 2009 (2)
  • August 2009 (9)
  • July 2009 (6)
  • June 2009 (5)
  • May 2009 (6)
  • April 2009 (5)
  • March 2009 (10)
  • February 2009 (6)
  • January 2009 (4)
  • Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed