Email Us Home

Template 1
  • Commercial
    • Introduction
    • Practice Areas
    • Our Team
    • Case Results
    • FAQs
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
  • Personal Injury
    • Introduction
    • Practice Areas
    • Our Team
    • Case Results
    • FAQs
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
  • Personal Services
    • Introduction
    • Practice Areas
    • Our Team
    • Appellate Opinions
    • FAQs
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
  • Law Firm Blogs
    • Commercial Blog
    • Personal Injury Blog
    • Personal Services Blog
    • Securities Litigation Blog
  • Attorneys
    • Katharine A.R. Brookeman
    • Elizabeth P. Coughter
    • James P. Cox, III
    • Gary W. Kendall
    • John V. Little
    • Edward B. Lowry
    • Kevin W. Ryan
    • William C. Scott IV
    • M. Bryan Slaughter
    • Garrett M. Smith
    • David W. Thomas
    • Christine Thomson
    • Paul R. Thomson III
    • Ronald R. Tweel
    • J. Gregory Webb
    • Edward R. Slaughter
    • Former Principles
  • Firm Profile
    • About Us
    • History
    • Charlottesville Office
    • Roanoke Office
    • Office Administration

A Heartwarming Decision for Consumers in this Holiday Season

user-pic By Garrett on December 10, 2009 12:36 PM | No Comments | No TrackBacks

A Judge Jeffrey Arlen Spinner, of the Supreme Court of New York's Suffolk County gave a Brookhaven, New York consumer whose loan servicer, IndyMac Mortgage Services, had obtained a judgment of foreclosure and sale a holiday reward for trying to work things out with the lender, while giving the lender ashes and switches for its misconduct.   The lender had badly delayed participation in a settlement conference required by New York law for sub-prime loans.  When a bank officer finally did appear, she was condescending, unwilling to discuss a sale to the borrower's daughter for fair market value, or a reasonable modification.  In addition she used inconsistent numbers to describe the debt.  The Court considered IndyMac's behavior to be outrageous.  Since foreclosure is a special remedy not just a request for money, the Court decided the case under rules that require a party seeking the equitable relief of a foreclosure to come into court with "clean hands"--something the servicing company lacked.  In the end, the Judge got so angry that he decided sanctions would not teach IndyMac a lesson and extinguished the borrower's debt altogether.  If you want to read a great story about a bank getting a beat-down, see here:  http://livinglies.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/indymac-bank-fsb-v-yano-horosky.pdf

 

Categories:

  • Commercial

Tags:

  • foreclosure,
  • lending,
  • loan servicer,
  • sub prime loans

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.mhlrt.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/87

Leave a comment

Template 1

Search

Sign In

Authors

  • Garrett (21)
  • Katharine (3)
  • Kevin (4)
  • Paul, Roanoke, Virginia Attorney (35)

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Garrett published on December 10, 2009 12:36 PM.

Credit Card Companies Experiment with Annual Fees was the previous entry in this blog.

The Robots Are Coming (PART ONE) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

  • January 2010 (3)
  • December 2009 (3)
  • October 2009 (4)
  • September 2009 (2)
  • August 2009 (9)
  • July 2009 (6)
  • June 2009 (5)
  • May 2009 (6)
  • April 2009 (5)
  • March 2009 (10)
  • February 2009 (6)
  • January 2009 (4)
  • Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed