Email Us Home

Template 1
  • Commercial
    • Introduction
    • Practice Areas
    • Our Team
    • Case Results
    • FAQs
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
  • Personal Injury
    • Introduction
    • Practice Areas
    • Our Team
    • Case Results
    • FAQs
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
  • Personal Services
    • Introduction
    • Practice Areas
    • Our Team
    • Appellate Opinions
    • FAQs
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
  • Law Firm Blogs
    • Commercial Blog
    • Personal Injury Blog
    • Personal Services Blog
    • Securities Litigation Blog
  • Attorneys
    • Elizabeth P. Coughter
    • James P. Cox, III
    • Gary W. Kendall
    • John V. Little
    • Edward B. Lowry
    • Kevin W. Ryan
    • William C. Scott IV
    • M. Bryan Slaughter
    • Garrett M. Smith
    • David W. Thomas
    • Christine Thomson
    • Ronald R. Tweel
    • J. Gregory Webb
    • Edward R. Slaughter
    • Former Principles
  • Firm Profile
    • About Us
    • History
    • Charlottesville Office
    • Roanoke Office
    • Office Administration

Tort Reforms That Undermine Right to Trial by Jury

user-pic By Kevin on April 15, 2010 3:58 PM | No Comments | No TrackBacks

Tort Reforms That Undermine Right to Trial by Jury

Ask Legislators to Violate Their Oath of Office

 

TRIAL BY JURY in suits at common law is a right that "shall be preserved" according to Article VII of the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia states that "in suits between man and man, trial by jury is preferable to any other, and ought to be held sacred." Article VIII, Section 11.

In taking their oath of office, the President of the United States, U.S. Senators and Congressman, and the Governor, officers and legislators in the Commonwealth of Virginia swear or affirm to defend the Constitution of the United States.

Men should be good neighbors to each other but the Constitution recognizes that when they are not, the right to trial by jury shall be preserved as the way to achieve a just resolution of their disputes. The oaths taken by our leaders as a prerequisite to holding office are oaths to uphold the Constitution and, thereby, uphold the right to trial by jury. This recognizes that the touchstone of law and power in the United States is the Constitution. Not the flag. Not the Oval Office. Not the Capitol. Not Wall Street.

Businesses should be good neighbors too, but while the rule "do unto others" may guide the conduct of individuals, the rule "maximize the bottom line" more often guides the conduct of businesses. Financial fraud, price fixing, price gouging, cutting corners, dumping toxic waste, making motor vehicles that attract buyers but catch fire on their own or easily roll over, and selling drugs, toys and other products that poison, maim and kill - all these add to the bottom line - as long as lawsuits don't get in the way. "Tort reform" is all about protecting that bottom line and doing away with lawsuits. It has nothing to do with making motor vehicles and other products safer, drugs safer, patients safer. Trial by jury is the remedy under the Constitution for holding wrongdoers accountable for not being good neighbors.

When the U. S. Chamber of Commerce, its Institute for Legal Reform, and corporations, interest groups, lobbyists and politicians talk about the need for "tort reform," they are asking legislators to chip away at our Constitutional right to trial by jury to hold corporations accountable.

If we saw these companies and industries on the playground when we were kids, we'd say they were bullies, wanting to push people around without having to answer to anyone.

Tort Reform is a one way street. Its goal is the elimination of the checks and balances on corporate power that trial by jury preserves by putting power into the hands of the people of the United States.

Legislators putting caps on the amount of damages that juries can award for medical malpractice claims, punitive damages, pain and suffering; creating rules that make it harder for people to prove their cases and get their cases before a jury; legislatures granting privileges and immunities from liability of one kind and another; allowing defendants to force plaintiffs to arbitrate a claim instead of going before a jury - the tools for taking away the right to trial by jury are many and devious. At times you need a Sherlock Holmes to sift through all the cries of alarm, the justifications and the deceptions to see that what they are really doing is taking a bit here, a bit there, until they have stolen from us this golden tool entrusted to us by our Founding Fathers for preserving a just society for generations of Americans yet to come. Our elected representatives have taken an oath to defend the Constitution. When it comes to tort reforms that undermine trial by jury, they should just say no.

___________________________

Presidential Oath - "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of the President of the Unites States, and will, to the best of my ability, preserve and defend the Constitution of the Unites States."

U. S. Senate and Congress - "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the Unites States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."

Commonwealth of Virginia - "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the Unites States, and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent upon me as _________ (office) according to the best of my ability (so help me God)." Virginia Constitution, Article II, Section 7.

 

 

Categories:

  • Personal Injury

Tags:

  • caps on damages,
  • defective products,
  • tort reform,
  • trial by jury,
  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce,
  • U.S. Constitution

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.mhlrt.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/106

Leave a comment

Template 1

Search

Sign In

Authors

  • MichieHamlett Attorney (35)
  • Garrett (21)
  • Katharine (3)
  • Kevin (8)
  • Patricia (1)

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Kevin published on April 15, 2010 3:58 PM.

Check your Graco Harmony High Chair - Recall Announced March 18, 2010 was the previous entry in this blog.

Have you ever heard of Law Day? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

  • July 2010 (1)
  • April 2010 (2)
  • March 2010 (2)
  • January 2010 (3)
  • December 2009 (3)
  • October 2009 (4)
  • September 2009 (2)
  • August 2009 (9)
  • July 2009 (6)
  • June 2009 (5)
  • May 2009 (6)
  • April 2009 (5)
  • March 2009 (10)
  • February 2009 (6)
  • January 2009 (4)
  • Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed